التسميات

الأحد، 29 يوليو 2018

The Role Played By Collective Intelligence In Risk Management

By Charles Wright


The reason why risk managers are employed is so that they can ensure an entity is safe from any adverse occurrences. That is why in this writing the application of collective intelligence in managing risk will be looked at exhaustively. The problem is that some of these managers are not given the right information, tools, and knowledge so that they can deal with some of the potential risks the right way. Most of them will be fed with information regarding something that went wrong in the past other than focusing on what the future holds.

The data you will read here is on the various kinds of intelligence that the people in power need to have to execute their mandate the right way. Their types are many, but the ones that are mostly put in use are three. One of them addresses issues to do with the organization such as the improvement in technology, some of the structures of the company and the culture.

Another kind that is worth mentioning is the one that deals with commerce and hence addressing factors that are mostly external. It will touch on other firms that are competing with the business, the suppliers and the loyal clients to the industry. Collecting this data means you will need to talk to most of them in person so that they can address some of the vital issues that must be tackled.

Another aspect will have to do with the technical bit, and this deals with how operations take place at the firm on a daily basis. All the methods used will be scrutinized to ensure that everything that happens is in line with the various stipulations of the law. If such information is taken to the individuals that are running the entity, then they will be in a better position to make decisions that are informed.

It works well if all stakeholders and the ones running an entity can be able to work together towards a common goal. Most of the team members will put their suggestions and concerns on the internet. The issues are generally discussed with other members every time that they meet so that solutions can be suggested and even ways in which to mitigate the threat.

In such an approach, people do not have to necessarily be undertaken through training for them to be ready to make suggestions on the way forward. In whatever capacity that one is, they will be called upon to have an opinion on some issue. That implies that everything including the cost incurred by the company and time is saved.

Whereas most organizations rely on whistle-blowing, it is usually followed by a lot of critical repercussions. That is why open communication is supported because many people will get to tell it the way it is without having to fear. The risk of getting exposed will make many employees avoid practices such as theft and other unethical behaviors.

The approach psychologically works to convince an employee that the management cares about them especially when they are involved in such decision-making processes. The moment you manage to make them feel honored and appreciated for what they do then the goal has been achieved.




About the Author:



ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق